Add abstract
Want to add your dissertation abstract to this database? It only takes a minute!
Search abstract
Search for abstracts by subject, author or institution
Want to add your dissertation abstract to this database? It only takes a minute!
Search for abstracts by subject, author or institution
by Fetahi Gobaw Getachew
Institution: | University of South Africa |
---|---|
Year: | 2016 |
Keywords: | Biology laboratory performance skill; Laboratory manuals; Level of competence; Performance test; Science process skills; Undergraduate biology |
Posted: | 02/05/2017 |
Record ID: | 2099786 |
Full text PDF: | http://hdl.handle.net/10500/20223 |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the undergraduate biology practical instructions and the level of competence of undergraduate biology students in practical laboratory skills in some Ethiopian universities using skill performance rubric and questionnaires. A sample of 208 third year students and 26 instructors and laboratory assistants from three universities were selected as sample of the study. Students reported that more than 84.2% of the laboratory activities are below the average number of laboratory activities recommended by the curriculum with no significant difference between universities. The laboratory skill performance test score was below the midpoint. None of the students could be able to estimate and determine fields of vision of a microscope. There is a significant and a positively linear relationship between the students’ grade point average (GPA) with identification of laboratory equipment, handling of microscope, setting of microscope, estimation of diameter of field of vision and measuring liquid. Laboratory skill performance test score is correlated with higher education entrance exam score but not with students’ high school laboratory back ground. There is no significant difference in instructor’s manipulative skills among universities (p ≥ 0.09) and instructors manipulative skills is neither correlated with qualification nor teaching experience (P≥0.056). The most common method of assessment instructors’ use in the laboratory is laboratory report and identification of specimen examination (46.4%) and written exam and identification of specimen examination (35.7%). The number of courses having laboratory manuals is as low as 14.3%, in the new university. Manipulating materials, measuring and using numbers, and pre lab activity were common activities, and were found in every manual and in every university. Moreover, the result also revealed that the manuals contain high percentage rate of basic science process skills (75.4%) as compared to the integrated science process skills (24.6%). Correlation and multiple regression analyses revealed that students’ laboratory performance skills is significantly positively correlated with higher education entrance exam score, availability of laboratory resources and instructors experiences. Instructors’ experience has significant positive regression weights Advisors/Committee Members: Atagana, H. I (advisor).
Want to add your dissertation abstract to this database? It only takes a minute!
Search for abstracts by subject, author or institution
An Answer to Disenfranchised Students
High School Credit-Recovery and Acceleration Progr...
|
|
Program Evaluation of the Latinas Learning to Lead...
A Leadership Development Program for Young Hispani...
|
|
Exploring Multicultural Counseling Competence with...
A Mixed Methods Study
|
|
The Military Academy of Malaysia Compared with Wes...
Learning Environments and New Technology
|
|
Bilingual Education in Chenalhó, Chiapas in Southe...
|
|
Color Education in the Interior Design Curriculum
|
|
Computer Usage in Fourth and Fifth Grade Elementar...
|
|
Dialogic Oriented Shared Book Reading Practices fo...
|
|