Add abstract
Want to add your dissertation abstract to this database? It only takes a minute!
Search abstract
Search for abstracts by subject, author or institution
Want to add your dissertation abstract to this database? It only takes a minute!
Search for abstracts by subject, author or institution
by Gregory 1975- Campos
Institution: | Central Connecticut State University |
---|---|
Year: | 2017 |
Keywords: | United States. Supreme Court Cases.; Sentences (Criminal procedure) |
Posted: | 02/01/2018 |
Record ID: | 2181223 |
Full text PDF: | http://content.library.ccsu.edu/u?/ccsutheses,2480 |
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), was a landmark Supreme Court Case that made the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory. Prior to this ruling, U.S. District Judges had limited options if they wanted to sentence outside of the guidelines (also called a departure). The purpose of this study is to examine what effect, if any, an advisory guideline has had on sentence length in the District of Connecticut. It is this writer's belief that sentence lengths for the crimes prosecuted in Connecticut U.S. District Courts have dropped since the Booker ruling in 2005. The reasoning for this is, while Judges wanted some guidelines in place, they did not want to lose their ability to form appropriate sentences based on the facts presented to them. The nature of the mandatory sentencing guidelines created limitations on the Judge's ability to use their years of training and education to impose just sentences. This hypothesis was evaluated two ways. First, there was a comparison of the mean sentence length for all crimes prosecuted in the District of Connecticut prior to the Booker decision (1999-2004) and after (2006-2011). Second, there was a comparison of the mean sentence length for drug and firearm cases during the same two time periods. A third hypothesis was evaluated. Given that the guidelines were intended to create parity in sentencing it should be expected that reduction of mean sentence lengths will remain consistent during the studied timeframe for white and black defendants. The results of the data analysis showed a reduction in mean sentence length, a reduction in firearm and drug sentence length overall, and a reduction when comparing black and white sentence length. The results in this study could be used to improve sentencing outcomes for defendants who are sentenced under the guidelines. "Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters in Criminal Justice."; Thesis advisor: Kathleen Bantley.; M.S.,Central Connecticut State University,,2017.;Advisors/Committee Members: Bantley, Kathleen.
Want to add your dissertation abstract to this database? It only takes a minute!
Search for abstracts by subject, author or institution
Electric Cooperative Managers' Strategies to Enhan...
|
|
Bullied!
Coping with Workplace Bullying
|
|
The Filipina-South Floridian International Interne...
Agency, Culture, and Paradox
|
|
Solution or Stalemate?
Peace Process in Turkey, 2009-2013
|
|
Performance, Managerial Skill, and Factor Exposure...
|
|
The Deritualization of Death
Toward a Practical Theology of Caregiving for the ...
|
|
Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Styles
Exploring the Relationship between Emotional Intel...
|
|
Commodification of Sexual Labor
Contribution of Internet Communities to Prostituti...
|
|
The Census of Warm Debris Disks in the Solar Neigh...
|
|
Risk Factors and Business Models
Understanding the Five Forces of Entrepreneurial R...
|
|